Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Cognoscere: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Media Pendidikan
Articles
DOI: 10.61292/cognoscere.285
Published: 2023-10-07

Gamification in Qur’anic Learning: Evidence from Muslim Students in Hybrid Classrooms

Departement of Islamic Communication Broadcasting Muhammadiyah University Bengkulu
Departement of Islamic Communication Broadcasting , Muhammadiyah University Bengkulu
Departement of Islamic Communication Broadcasting , Muhammadiyah University Bengkulu
Departement of Islamic Communication Broadcasting , Muhammadiyah University Bengkulu
Department of Management, Muhammadiyah University Bengkulu
Gamification Qur'anic Learning Hybrid Classroom Self-Determination Theory Islamic Education

Abstract

This study critically examines the application of gamification features—points, badges, and leaderboards—within hybrid Qur'anic learning environments, testing their influence on student motivation and learning outcomes through a Self-Determination Theory framework. Employing a quantitative approach with SmartPLS analysis on data from 250 Muslim students, the research yielded a critical paradox: while points and badges positively influenced engagement, leaderboards demonstrated a negative effect, and crucially, the resulting engagement failed to translate into improved Qur'anic learning effectiveness. The model's explanatory power was severely limited (R² = 0.021 for learning outcomes), and a fundamental measurement model failure was observed, with invalid reliability and validity metrics (e.g., negative Cronbach's Alpha). This comprehensive model invalidity challenges the direct transferability of secular gamification models to religious education, suggesting that extrinsic rewards may undermine intrinsic spiritual motivation. The study concludes that a paradigm shift is necessary, advocating for the development of a unique, theologically-grounded gamification pedagogy that prioritizes spiritual growth over competitive mechanics and calls for a fundamental reconceptualization of engagement metrics in sacred learning contexts.

References

  1. Bates, A. W. (2019). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Tony Bates Associates Ltd.
  2. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining "gamification". Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, 9–15.
  3. Huang, R., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Sommer, M., Zhu, J., Stephen, A., Valle, N., ... & Li, J. (2020). The impact of gamification in educational settings on student learning outcomes: A meta- analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1875–1901.
  4. Ismail, M. Z., Bakar, N. A., & Akhir, N. M. (2021). The challenges of Tahfiz students in hybrid learning environment. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(6), 1205–1217.
  5. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
  6. Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77–112.
  7. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  9. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
  10. Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 7.
  11. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  12. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
  13. Ismail, M. Z., Bakar, N. A., & Akhir, N. M. (2021). The challenges of Tahfiz students in hybrid learning environment. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(6), 1205-1217.
  14. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24
  15. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627-668.
  16. Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3025-3034.
  17. Zosh, J. M., Hopkins, E. J., Jensen, H., Liu, C., Neale, D., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Solis, S. L., & Whitebread, D. (2017). Learning through play: A review of the evidence. LEGO Foundation.

How to Cite

Amin, S., Nurfadilla , A., Rasman, Puspitasari , A., & N.Baskautshar. (2023). Gamification in Qur’anic Learning: Evidence from Muslim Students in Hybrid Classrooms. Cognoscere: Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Media Pendidikan, 1(2), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.61292/cognoscere.285