Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Cognoscere: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Media Pendidikan
Articles
DOI: 10.61292/cognoscere.302
Published: 2026-05-19

Pengaruh Artificial Intelligence (AI) terhadap Efektivitas Proses Pembelajaran di Era Digital

Fakultas Dharma Acarya, Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar
Artificial Intelligence Learning Effectiveness Systematic Literature Review Critical Thinking Digital Era

Abstract

This systematic literature review (SLR) analyzes the influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on learning effectiveness in the digital era by reviewing 33 key academic references. Utilizing the PRISMA protocol, this study synthesizes findings regarding cognitive impacts, student engagement, and the ethical challenges of AI integration in education. Meta-analysis results indicate an overall effect size of , with Generative AI and chatbot technologies achieving the highest performance at . In Indonesia, AI implementation has significantly improved students' critical thinking skills, raising average scores from 47.13 to 75.96. However, the study reveals a "Crutch Effect" paradox, where over-reliance leads to a 17% performance drop in unassisted exams. Other systemic challenges include the risk of "Cognitive Surrender" and the digital divide in 3T (underdeveloped, outermost, and frontier) regions. In conclusion, AI serves as a catalyst for learning effectiveness, the success of which is mediated by pedagogical design and human-AI synergy. The adoption of Socratic AI models is recommended to preserve learners' cognitive agency.

Abstrak

Tinjauan literatur sistematis (SLR) ini menganalisis pengaruh Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) terhadap efektivitas pembelajaran di era digital dengan meninjau 33 referensi akademik utama. Menggunakan protokol PRISMA, penelitian ini mensintesis dampak kognitif, keterlibatan siswa, serta tantangan etis integrasi AI dalam pendidikan. Hasil meta-analisis menunjukkan ukuran efek keseluruhan sebesar , dengan teknologi AI Generatif dan chatbot mencatat performa tertinggi sebesar . Di Indonesia, implementasi AI terbukti meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa secara signifikan dari skor rata-rata 47,13 menjadi 75,96. Namun, studi ini mengungkap paradoks "Crutch Effect" di mana ketergantungan berlebihan memicu penurunan performa sebesar 17% pada ujian tanpa bantuan AI. Tantangan sistemik lainnya mencakup risiko "Cognitive Surrender" dan kesenjangan digital di wilayah 3T. Kesimpulannya, AI berperan sebagai katalisator efektivitas pembelajaran yang keberhasilannya dimediasi oleh desain pedagogis dan sinergi manusia-AI. Disarankan pengadopsian model Socratic AI untuk menjaga agensi kognitif peserta didik.

Kata Kunci: Kecerdasan Buatan, Efektivitas Pembelajaran, Systematic Literature Review, Berpikir Kritis, Era Digital.

References

  1. Al Faqir, A. A., Nurrizky, A. R., Anggraini, L., & Cholimah, N. (2025). Systematic literature review: The influence of intelligence variation in adaptive learning design. Jurnal Keilmuan Pendidikan, 1(2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.63203/040943100
  2. Almegren, A., Hassan Saleh, M., Abduljalil Nasr, H., Jamal Kaid, A., & Almegren, R. M. (2024). Evaluating the quality of AI feedback: A comparative study of AI and human essay grading. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2311108
  3. Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakcı, Ö., & Mariman, R. (2025). Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(26), e2422633122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422633122
  4. Blasco, A., & Charisi, V. (2025). AI chatbots in K-12 education: An experimental study of Socratic vs. non-Socratic AI agents and the role of step-by-step reasoning [Preprint]. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5040921
  5. Chen, E., Judicke, S., Beigh, K., et al. (2025). Generative AI alone may not be enough: Evaluating AI support for learning mathematical proof [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.16778
  6. Chukwu, C. O., Chukwu, J. C., & Odey, F. A. (2026). AI-powered learning tools on measurement of student engagement across academic disciplines: Implications of age and gender. Educational Point, 3(1), e144. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/17782
  7. Degen, P. B., & Asanov, I. (2025). Beyond automation: Socratic AI, epistemic agency, and the implications of the emergence of orchestrated multi-agent learning architectures [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.05116
  8. Dong, Y. (2026). Generative AI technologies and educational outcomes: A comprehensive meta-analysis comparing traditional and AI-driven approaches. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06903-y
  9. Ferman, B., Lima, L., & Riva, F. (2021). Artificial intelligence, teacher tasks and individualized pedagogy (Working Paper). J-PAL.
  10. Fesler, L., Martinez, J., Agnew, C., & Loeb, S. (2026). The evidence base on AI in K-12: A 2026 Review. AI Hub for Education of the SCALE Initiative, Stanford University.
  11. Garzón, J., Patiño, E., & Marulanda, C. (2025). Systematic review of artificial intelligence in education: Trends, benefits, and challenges. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 9(8), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti9080084
  12. Ikram, M., Hanefar, S. B. M., Saleem, S. M. U., & Zulfiqar, F. (2026). Artificial intelligence in education: a systematic review of personalized learning trends and future directions. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1782626. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1782626
  13. Lehmann, M., Cornelius, P. B., & Sting, F. J. (2025). AI meets the classroom: When do large language models harm learning? [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.09047
  14. Long, D. Y., Wang, S., Md Rashid, S., & Lu, X. T. (2026). Artificial intelligence in higher education: a systematic review of its impact on student engagement and the mediating role of teaching methods. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1648661. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1648661
  15. Magvira, & Nensilianti. (2025). Pengaruh penggunaan media berbasis artificial intelligence (AI) terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan keterampilan menulis teks eksposisi siswa kelas X UPT SMA Negeri 4 Luwu. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra, 11(2), 1777-1799. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i2.5700
  16. Meyer, J., Jansen, T., Schiller, R., et al. (2024). Using LLMs to bring evidence-based feedback into the classroom: AI-generated feedback increases secondary students’ text revision, motivation, and positive emotions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100199
  17. Roy, P., Poet, H., Staunton, R., Aston, K., & Thomas, D. (2024). ChatGPT in lesson preparation: A teacher choices trial (Evaluation Report). National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER).
  18. Stadler, M., Bannert, M., & Sailer, M. (2024). Cognitive ease at a cost: LLMs reduce mental effort but compromise depth in student scientific inquiry. Computers in Human Behavior, 160, 108386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108386
  19. Waita, B. C., Yiswi, T. A., & Kristiahadi, A. (2025). Dampak artificial intelligence (AI) terhadap pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(7), 3112–3121.
  20. Wiranatha, P. A., Mahayanti, N. W. S., & Adnyayanti, N. L. P. E. (2026). The double-edged impact of artificial intelligence on students’ critical thinking skills in Indonesia: A systematic literature review. Journal of Education and Teaching Learning (JETL), 8(1), 74-91.
  21. Zhao, C., Silva, M., & Poulsen, S. (2025). Autograding mathematical induction proofs with natural language processing [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.10268

How to Cite

Pendiasari, N. L. C. (2026). Pengaruh Artificial Intelligence (AI) terhadap Efektivitas Proses Pembelajaran di Era Digital. Cognoscere: Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Media Pendidikan, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.61292/cognoscere.302